|
The fact of the matter is that it is hard
selling anything these days given the restrictions that apply to sales
activities.
Someone forgot to tell
the bureaucrats who endorsed the no-call lists, the restrictions on unsolicited
faxes and the current proposals to deal with spam that nothing in this country
happens until a sale is made. That's free enterprise, a free market economy.
While I don't like to be
interrupted at my precious dinners at home by telephone solicitors, I do have
caller ID and simply don't answer the phone. I receive the occasional
unsolicited fax but I just throw it a way or delete it (my fax is an efax) and
while my email inbox also fills with spam, there are a few that are of
occasional interest (the Viagra ones are not for obvious reasons.)
However, I defend the
right of free commerce to solicit business. These techniques must work or no one
would be using them. It is very difficult to be a sales person of any kind these
days. The noble profession of sales has been given a black eye and this rubs off
on our hotel sales people. One of whom told me that she didn't want to do her
sales calls because she felt like "a solicitor." The problem with this? How does
anyone expect to produce new revenue unless you solicit it?
An article in the Denver
Post on Monday, November 10 went into great detail about how companies who have
previously relied on telemarketing are changing strategies to more cost
intensive personal solicitation. I would rather have the option of ignoring a
phone call than facing an army of people ringing my doorbell during dinner. A
personal email that I emailed to a colleague in an industry association ended up
in her 'Spam' box --unnoticed for two weeks!
While the limitations on
telephone calls are not restricted in a Business-to-Business environment, the
generally negative attitude toward sales people has permeated our target
clients' mindsets as well. They don't answer their phone; they allow it to go to
voice mail. Hence, why "dialing for dollars" no longer works in most markets.
Try cold calling in a large office building in most major markets today --
security will be on your tail in five minutes, if it takes them that long!
|
There were actually two articles I
wanted to write this month based on two articles I read recently. Bear
with me because they are both related. |
An article by Alan Webber, a founding
editor of Fast company, appeared in USA Today on November 3, 2002 entitled
companies Repeat Mistake of Cutting Investment in Workers. "One of the easiest
ways to make your numbers look better is to cut back on 'non-essential' items.
Training and Development can be axed.
(This includes) programs that give
executives -- or any workers -- new ideas, new techniques, new tactics and new
approaches to winning in the workplace. Once the tyranny of numbers sets in,
almost any investment in people is an easy target."
Alan Webber goes on to
remind us that in the 1970's American industry was preoccupied with the
"numbers" or as he puts it, financial engineering. The Japanese weren't -- they
invested in their people and subsequently outperformed their US competitors in
terms of quality and price. The same "movie" is repeating itself and as he said
and I quote, "
it has an ugly ending." "The only way to produce sizable profits,
to succeed against competition and to chalk up impressive growth is through
constant innovation. And the only way to do that is by investing in employees."
Okay, how are these two
issues related? The world of sales is changing rapidly and will continue to do
so. It is tougher and requires a paradigm shift in the way we conduct hotel
sales. It is an exciting change for those who embrace it.
A hotel sales person
asked the following question after a presentation to her company's annual
meeting. "With the role of technology so prevalent in our industry will we still
need sales people?" Absolutely!
What we need to do is
re-define the relationships between sales and operations, especially revenue
management, sales and marketing, sales and reservations. It's not just the sales
staff that needs to rethink how they are going to solicit and how to use the new
tech tools, it is the entire revenue generating engine of the hotel that needs
to make a paradigm shift in how we do business effectively in relation to how
our current and target clients have changed.
I can hear all of you
thinking "here it comes -- the shameless pitch for training. "The fact of the
matter is that those of us who have enjoyed any success in this industry can
attribute that to having been trained well, because someone invested in us, not
because we are the brightest light on the tree. I know hotel companies who spend
more money training their front desk associates than they do training their
sales staff and have a very high turnover rate Not that the front
desk doesn't deserve training. For both groups and every employee in the hotel,
there are many more training options than existed even two years ago!
|
Hence, the relationship between the
first article on the difficulties of sales and the second on investing in
people. |
We have to embrace innovation and
train for innovation in the way we conduct sales to deal with the new challenges
presented in the Denver Post article. Our love/hate relationship with technology
is forcing us, kicking and screaming, to re-think the benefits rather than the
obstacles to new ways of producing business.
There are no bullet
points at the end of this article -- answers to these issues are not that easy.
We need to reframe the questions first.
A business book I re mend
is entitled "Its not the BIG that eat the SMALL -- it's the FAST that eat the
SLOW" By Jennings and Haughton. I think the title says it all.
Happy Thanksgiving and remember to give
thanks for the sales people you have!
|